업무상횡령
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of eight months.
except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A From the end of January 2003 to January 201, 2014, the Minister of Justice, etc. of the Victim (g) FF Association (hereinafter “victim Association”) and Defendant B, from January 21, 2003 to April 30, 2014, performed duties such as operation of funds, execution, accounting, etc. of the Victim Association as the head of the victim association’s H team, etc., and Defendant B performed duties such as the selection of the supplier company.
1. Defendant A
A. In relation to the business embezzlement related to the price of goods I, the Defendant ordered the victim association's business director in charge of supplying subscription goods, such as the field factory, etc., to order the amount less than the amount actually supplied to I by the victim association, and remitted the amount to the victim association, the Defendant agreed that the amount equivalent to the above amount of the increased amount shall be returned in cash, and such agreement shall be received from the J to return the cash for personal purposes, such as the drinking value, etc.
Therefore, on December 28, 2009, the Defendant returned 5.720,00 won from J to one bank account (L) in the name of the 3,58880,000 won, which was transferred from the Agricultural Cooperative (K) in the name of the victim association (L) in the name of the J on the same day to the 3,5880,000 won of goods in the name of the branch court (L). The Defendant embezzled it by using the Defendant’s drinking value, living expenses, etc. around that time, and embezzled it by using the Defendant’s drinking value, living expenses, etc. from around that time to December 23, 2013, “On December 28, 2013,” as stated in the indictment on December 28, 2013, the Defendant embezzled the Defendant’s total amount of money for 1911,2407,297, and 2971 by using the aforementioned method as stated in the attached list I in the following manner.
B. The Defendant’s occupational embezzlement related to the price of M goods is the president of MM who supplies subscription goods, such as camping boats, to the victim association.