In light of the relevant legal principles and evidence, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, without failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged in the grounds of appeal, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act.

In addition, the argument that the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the admissibility of evidence in the suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant prepared by the prosecutor is not a legitimate ground for appeal, and it is not a legitimate ground for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.