A knife (30cm in total length, 18.5cm in knife) used at the time of the seizure.

Around May 2016, the Defendant lost the workplace with three months serving, and received the awareness of divorce by the re-refinites, with the mind that “the Defendant shall use money in return for committing suicide.” The Defendant was willing to commit so-called “finite murder” in the context of having been living in a computer game while consuming the money that he/she received while living in the computer game.

On September 15, 2016, around 13:37, the Defendant confirmed that he had opened the door before the residence of the victim D (Inn, 72 years of age), who was in front of his house, and infringed on the said residence by using a lethal weapon, which was prepared in advance at his house (No. 1, 30cm in total length, 18.5cm in length), and found the victim who was in motion in the toilet, and knife three times in the knife. However, the Defendant knife found the victim who was in motion in the toilet and knife the part of the victim in this knife, but knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

In the end, the defendant did not kill the victim and did so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police about D;

1. Report on internal investigation (the identification of the suspect and the escape route), each investigation report (the identification of the suspect, the discovery of the criminal implements, personal information related to the identification of the suspect's site, the attachment of a victim's diagnosis, and the reproduction of the suspect's crime);

1. Each protocol of seizure, each list of seizure, and each photograph of seized articles;

1. A report on the results of field identification;

1. Application of field photographs, CCTV photographs, and related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 254 and 250 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of applicable sentences by law: Imprisonment for not less than five years nor more than thirty years; and

2. The application of the sentencing criteria [the determination of types] There is no motive for criticism (type 3) as to murder (the scope of recommending punishment] (the scope of recommending punishment).