공사대금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendant in the judgment amounting to KRW 39,234,460 and its amount from February 14, 201 to October 22, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in Articles 1 and 20 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning for the court’s explanation is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal or deletion of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.
【The part to be removed or set aside 【The Defendant is not in line with the 13th sentence from the 4th sentence 7th sentence ? The Defendant, separate from the 5th sentence 5th sentence (Receipt) that he remitted 20 million won to L account to the Plaintiff on November 2, 2010, it is difficult to understand the reasoning of holding and paying the Plaintiff’s cash, but rather, it is difficult to view that the Defendant, on November 6, 2010, paid 40 million won to the Plaintiff for the amount of KRW 50,000 (No. 14-1 and 2) plus KRW 20,000,000,000,000 from the 5th sentence of the 4th sentence 7th sentence (the 5th sentence) to the 5th sentence 16th sentence (the 16th day of the 16th sentence) as the 5th sentence (the 16th day of the 2016th sentence).
The 7th page of the 7th page "amount of the cost for the repair of defects" is raised as "amount of the cost for the repair of defects."
The “20,765,740 won” of the 8th sentence is deemed to be “20,765,540 won”.
The 8th page “4,081,280 won” is deemed to be “4,081,260 won”.
The 8th parallel 14 to 9th parallel shall be as follows.
“Along with this case’s construction contract, the Plaintiff and the Defendant excluded only a fence and gate installation work while performing a new construction work, and the testimony of the witness P of the first instance court is to exclude the fence and gate installation work in accordance with the instant construction contract.