beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.03.22 2017가단68944

임차료

Text

1. The Defendant is KRW 3,33,33 each month from March 24, 2017 to the completion date of delivery of real estate indicated in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 (including the number of branch offices) as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff, on February 26, 2016, purchased each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the building of this case") from KRW 5 million, annual rent of KRW 40 million, and annual rent of KRW 20 million from March 24, 2016 to March 23, 2019, and paid the rent in advance in three months prior to the payment date of rent, and the plaintiff was not entitled to terminate the lease contract of this case (hereinafter "the lease contract of this case"), and the plaintiff was still entitled to terminate the lease contract of this case to the defendant 20 years prior to the expiration of the lease contract of this case to the defendant 20 years prior to the expiration of the lease contract of this case to the defendant 30 years prior to the expiration of the lease contract of this case.

According to the above facts, despite the completion of the instant lease agreement on March 23, 2017, the Defendant still uses and benefits from the instant real estate and thereby causes damage to the Plaintiff. Therefore, the Defendant gains therefrom.