가등기말소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are deemed legitimate even if the evidence submitted to this court was neglected.
Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the defendant added the judgment on the argument that the court of first instance made in this court is identical with that of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil
In the judgment of the court of first instance (hereinafter omitted), each of the “Plaintiffs” in Section 2, each of the “Defendants”, and each of the “Defendants” shall be deemed to be each “Plaintiffs”.
Part 5. The entry of "No. 6-1, 2, and 3" in Part 6 is as follows: "No. 6, 70,000 won including each number of evidence No. 6, and No. 7. 5 is as follows: "No. 230,670,000 won" shall be as follows: "No. 230,670,000 won" and "No. 230,670,000 won are as of May 18, 2004 and June 22, 2004; No. 5,00,000 won are as of October 16, 2014; and No. 15,00,00 won are as of "the calculation of No. 1516,580,000 won" and "No. 16,501,000 won" shall be appropriated as "the calculation of No. 2501,710,00 won" and each of the attached Table No. 15. 2.
2. Additional determination
A. The defendant's assertion that the plaintiff borrowed money exceeding KRW 133,00,000,00 which is proved by the loan certificate, such as borrowing KRW 35,00,000 from D on June 18, 200. The amount of the plaintiff's repayment is about the borrowed money without the loan certificate, and the amount of the loan is about KRW 62,00,000,000 as the secured principal of the provisional registration of this case. The plaintiff paid only interest for the above KRW 62 million at the same time.