손해배상(기)
1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) Company B and the Defendants jointly share the amount of KRW 4,691,847,424 against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company that mainly engages in the manufacture and sale of tobacco, red ginseng, and functional health foods. Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”).
) The Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) is the paper processing and sales business, the paper export and import business, and the Defendant C Co., Ltd.
(ii) Defendant D is a former director and a de facto operator of Defendant B, and is a person acquiring and operating Defendant C around 1982, respectively.
Defendant E is the former interest of Defendant B and the representative director of Defendant C.
3) Defendant B and Defendant C use the office as the same, and Defendant C’s employees process the business related to the import of the raw materials, etc. of Defendant C’s balance sheet spread (the part in which Defendant C’s employees contact with the influence of tobacco rackers), and Defendant E reports various matters concerning the operation of Defendant C, including the cost of importing the raw materials, to Defendant C. B. The Plaintiff’s cooperative system operation and the unit cost calculation method1) provided a contract for the manufacture of some of the tobacco materials, such as a pen, a balance sheet file, and a cigarette printing, for the cost reduction of wages, etc., the Plaintiff provided a contract to an external company for the manufacture of some of the tobacco materials, such as a pen, a balance sheet file, among the external suppliers, and the supply rate for the Plaintiff among the tobacco materials, is high, and the stable supply is possible in light of quality and management status, and then designated as a cooperative company through an examination to provide the manufacturing cost necessary for the production of the product.
2) The Plaintiff: (a) around July 1998, designated Defendant B and F as a collaborative company with respect to the manufacture of the heat preserving spread; and (b) the Plaintiff designated Defendant B and F as a collaborative company; (c) due to the unique characteristics that there is no marketability in the case of tobacco products, such as the heat preserving spread, the Plaintiff is from Defendant B and F, the manufacturing company of the heat preserving spread.