2. The judgment of the court below is not unreasonable, comprehensively taking account of the following factors: the defendant's age, character and conduct, occupation and environment, background and consequence of the crime, and various sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, such as the defendant's age, character and environment, circumstance of the crime, and circumstance after the crime, etc., where it is acknowledged that there was a history of having been punished five times due to the larceny (in the case of a thieve sentence, two times) (in the case of a thieve sentence), and that the defendant committed the instant crime again since he was sentenced to six months in prison and was released from prison due to special larceny, and that the defendant committed the instant crime again.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.