A. A Promissory Notes (hereinafter “instant Promissory Notes”) was drawn up on May 2, 2008, including the Plaintiff, the Defendant, the date of issuance, KRW 30 million, and KRW 30 million at sight of the due date. On September 19, 2008, a notary public drafted a notarial deed to accept the Plaintiff’s compulsory execution (hereinafter “instant notarial deed”) in cases where the payment of the Promissory Notes is delayed due to No. 178, 2008, No. C. 2008. < Amended by Act No. 3178, Sep. 19, 2008>

B. The notarial deed of this case states that the defendant entrusted the preparation of the notarial deed as the plaintiff's agent, and its power of representation is recognized by the power of attorney attached to the plaintiff's certificate of personal

C. The Defendant seized and collected the Plaintiff’s claim for return of the lease deposit against Nonparty D based on the instant notarial deed as Seoul Eastern District Court 2018TTTT14384, and the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit seeking non-performance of compulsory execution based on the instant notarial deed.

No complaint was filed against the forgery of the power of attorney in the name of the Plaintiff attached to the Promissory Notes or the Notarial Deed of this case, and the Defendant is based on the Notarial Deed of this case.

No other petition shall be filed for compulsory execution except for compulsory execution stated in the paragraph.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 3 evidence, Eul 7 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant had the seal affixed to the Promissory Notes in his own discretion, and the power of attorney on the preparation of the Notarial Notes was forged, and further, the extinctive prescription of the Promissory Notes has expired.

As to this, the defendant asserts that the Promissory Notes and Notarial Deed were prepared in accordance with the due process, and that there was late application for compulsory execution due to the reasons such as the plaintiff's impossibility of delivery.

3. Determination

A. The defendant's discretion.