However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On October 4, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 22:30 on November 1, 2019, the Defendant driven BM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration of 0.134% at a section of about 500 meters from the front day of the ozone distance in the north-gu death zone at the port of port to the front day of the common interest distance in the same Gu-dong.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the result of crackdown on drinking driving and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of criminal records and summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act [The choice of imprisonment and the degree of blood alcohol concentration shall be taken into account];

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Da1548, Apr. 1, 201);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (in addition to the grounds for discretionary mitigation, taking into account the fact that a fine for a drunk driving has been sentenced once and that there is no other criminal records;

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;