직권면직무효확인
1. The Defendant’s ex officio dismissal on May 31, 2018 confirms that the dismissal of the Plaintiff is null and void.
2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.
1. Basic facts
A. The defendant is a corporation established on May 20, 1995 for the promotion of a rehabilitative business under the Act on Probation, etc.
B. The Plaintiff is a person who was employed by the Defendant around January 3, 1998 and was in charge of the Defendant’s employment as B from September 2016 to December 2017.
On December 31, 2001, the Plaintiff received the commendation from the chief executive officer of the Defendant and the commendation from the Minister of Justice on December 30, 2005.
C. On January 30, 2018, the Defendant was notified by the Audit Office of the Ministry of Justice of the result of a request for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff and other persons related to the employment cost, and an investigation request against the Plaintiff.
On April 5, 2018, the Defendant held a disciplinary committee and decided to reprimand the Plaintiff on the following grounds, and notified the Plaintiff on April 9, 2018 that he/she was punished by the reprimand on the following grounds.
(hereinafter “Disciplinary Action against Preliminary Employment” (hereinafter “Disciplinary Action against Preliminary Employment”). - In 2016, an inorganic contract employment (record management personnel) was inappropriate (hereinafter “Disciplinary Grounds for Disciplinary Action No. 1”) - The second interview employment braille (127 points) as originally planned. However, the interview score and additional points did not constitute two persons, one of which is the first document screening score and two persons, shall be selected as the final successful applicants without any basis, and the first document screening score and additional points shall be selected as the final successful applicants (hereinafter “Disciplinary Grounds for Disciplinary Action No. 2”), 2017 (hereinafter “Disciplinary Grounds for Disciplinary Action No. 2”), although the recruitment notice should be published on the website of the Corporation and the integrated site for employment of public institutions (NaL), two applicants shall be published only on the website of the Corporation for five days, and the final applicants for the employment of the Corporation shall be deemed to have prepared the standards for the selection of the final applicants except for the final administrative consultation (Class 7).