2. The crime of this case was committed in bad faith by the Defendant posted and widely spread erroneous information about the family members of the Sewol ferry, and thus, the need to punish the family members of the Sewol ferry who lose their family by an unforeseen accident is greater. The Defendant did not agree with the victims or have made the victims with the truth (the Defendant posted a letter of apology with the victim after the crime of this case. However, in full view of the whole context, context, language, etc. of the letter with the apology, it is argued that the Defendant’s mistake was recognized as limited to the scarcityal calculation rather than the scarcity, and thus, it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s punishment is reasonable in view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of the Defendant; (b) the Defendant did not appear to have committed a crime of this case; and (c) the Defendant’s motive, character, and behavior, method, and conditions of suspended execution, etc.; and (d) the Defendant’s punishment of this case’s punishment is too inappropriate after considering the following circumstances: (c) the Defendant’s motive and circumstances of this case’s punishment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.