beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.15 2013고단2651 (1)

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, with the trade name of "E", is a business owner that installs and operates a light-based screen game with the 19th main body of the light-based game machine, 20 units of the light-based game machine monitoring (L CD panel), 9 units of screen-based pcidr, 3 units of screen-based pcidr, etc., and F, G, and Defendant B are employees of the above game room.

1. Defendant A

A. Although a person who intends to conduct a game providing business must conduct the business with the permission of the head of the Si/Gun/Gu as prescribed by Presidential Decree, he/she operated the game room business without obtaining permission from November 20, 2012 to November 22:10, 2013.

B. A game product deemed to be a speculative game shall be classified by the Game Rating Board, and an unclassified game product shall not be provided for use or display or store for this purpose, the game product provided for the use of unspecified customers at the date, time, place, and the unclassified screen game at the time, place, and place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a).

(c) no person shall engage in the business of exchanging, exchanging or re-purchasing tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of a game product, but the date, time, place specified in the foregoing paragraph (a), and where customers obtain more than 3,00 points through a horse game, he/she shall deduct 10% of the commission from 135,000 won.

2. F, G, Defendants BF, G, and Defendant B agreed to receive an amount equivalent to KRW 5-60,000 per day from the above A, the game room business owner, from December 2, 2012 to March 11, 2013, the said E agreed to receive an amount of money equivalent to KRW 5-60,000 per day, and assisted and abetted the game room business by being employed as an employee, against the owners and customers in the game room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The legal statement of the witness H (as to the defendant A)

1. Protocol of examination of the witness of H (with respect to Defendant B)

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against G and Defendant F;

1.With respect to H and I, respectively.