손해배상(자)
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 625,113,454; (b) KRW 5,00,000; and (c) KRW 2,50,000; and (c) KRW 2,50,000, respectively, to Plaintiff A and D.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) F is a G vehicle owned by it (hereinafter “accidented vehicle”) around September 26, 2014, around 07:26, 2014.
2) The Plaintiff, while driving a vehicle and driving a vehicle at the central plaza located in Jinju-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-do (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”) caused the Plaintiff to be able to avoid crossing the road
2) The Plaintiff sustained an injury, such as the right fat, the focus on cerebral typhism, etc., due to the instant accident.
3) The Defendant is an insurer who has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the accident vehicle, and the Plaintiff’s wife, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff’s children are Plaintiff A. 【The ground for recognition’s absence of dispute, Plaintiff’s evidence 1 through 3, and Plaintiff’s evidence 1 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply).
- The purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident in this case as the insurer of the accident in the absence of special circumstances.
2. Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, each corresponding item of the annexed table for calculation of damages shall be the same as each corresponding item of the annexed table for calculation of damages, in principle, the period for calculation convenience shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than a month and less than a won shall be discarded, and the current price calculation at the time of the accident shall be governed by the method of deducting the intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12 per month
It is the purport of rejecting the claims of the parties, which are not stated separately.
[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 4, 7, Eul evidence 2, each of the evidence Nos. 2, and the result of each physical examination commissioned to the head of the I Hospital of this Court (nee and J, rehabilitation medical department and K professor) and the result of the fact-finding inquiry inquiry, the whole purport of the arguments.
A. The Plaintiff’s disability is as shown in the column for the “basic matters” in the attached Table 1 of the computation of personal information amount of damages (as seen below).