임대료
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. Around June 2013, the Plaintiff concluded a lease contract with the Defendant, such as temporary materials (building materials) and leased temporary materials to the Defendant from around November 14, 2013. The Defendant did not return not only a considerable amount of temporary materials leased by the Plaintiff but also a portion of the temporary materials leased by the Plaintiff for the reason of loss or loss. As such, the Defendant has the obligation to pay the Plaintiff the total of KRW 13,220,786 and the total of KRW 7,716,786 due to the extension of the lease period (i.e., KRW 13,220,786, KRW 7,716,00) and the value-added tax (i.e., KRW 20,716, KRW 716,00) and the total of KRW 2,093,678, KRW 736,786,786 x 103636,786,209).
2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence 2-1 through 5, Gap evidence 3, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1 through 15, Eul evidence 3-1 through 5, Eul evidence 3-1 through 5, the plaintiff is a person operating construction material leasing business, etc., the defendant is a company operating a construction business, etc., and the plaintiff has leased temporary materials, etc. to the defendant. As of May 29, 2013, the credit rent that the defendant has to pay to the plaintiff was KRW 304,00,00, and on June 15, 2013, the plaintiff leased 600 x 120 bit 250 bit 250 bit 120 60 , 1264, 200 , 200 , 301, 200 , 301, 204 , 2017.