beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.12.21 2017고단1773

사기

Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and by imprisonment for not more than two years for the crimes of No. 2 in the holding of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] On May 13, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for one year for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (U.S. short-term financial business) at the Ulsan District Court on May 13, 2008, and the judgment was finalized on December 19, 2008.

[Criminal facts]

1. On October 2007, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant is a person who manages the funds of high-ranking people in the Republic of Korea,” and that “on the basis of temporary lending of money due to the need to pay money, he would immediately pay the funds.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was not a person who manages the funds of high-ranking people, and did not hold the funds in Switzerland. Since the Defendant was planning to flee to the Philippines around May 2008, there was no intention to complete payment even if he borrowed money from the injured party.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, obtained the delivery of KRW 15.2 million from October 30, 2007 to November 30, 2008 as the borrowed money from the damaged party and acquired it by deceit.

2. The Defendant entered into a contract with the victim G and the victim H to export 3,000 km from Japan's public water fish farmer to the victim who entered into a contract with the victim who entered into the contract with the victim to export the 3,000 km from his own residence in November, 2013, on the basis that the net profit would have increased to 1,000 km from the export of the fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fats

"......"

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any 3,000 g g at the time, and there was no fishing ground that can keep fry in bulk, and there was no contract for export with the Japanese farmer. Therefore, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victims, it is agreed to do so.