If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

around 22:40 on June 3, 2019, the Defendant: (a) asked the victim D (28 years of age) who was an employee of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, that “I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am? I am. I am. I am the victim’s neck with the hand floor.

"2019 Highest 4274"

1. On June 11, 2019, around 23:20 on June 11, 2019, the Defendant destroyed the victim E-owned Hatoba, which was under the influence of alcohol in front of G street located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and damaged its utility by destroying the above Hatoba so that it would amount to KRW 1.2 million at its repair cost.

2. The Defendant committed the crime against the victim I, while under the influence of alcohol at the time and place set forth in the above Paragraph 1 above, prevented the victim I-owned self-surged vehicle, set a net set up on the top of the instant car, and damaged the car so that its utility can be achieved by destroying the car at the market price.

Summary of Evidence

"2019 Highest 3534"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Investigation reports (verification of CDs) 2019 Highest 4274;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of E and I;

1. Two copies of a photograph and a chassis;

1. Application of the written estimate for accident;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order committed each of the crimes of this case even though the defendant was committed for a repeated offense period. However, the defendant reflects the fact that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case, and again, it does not reach the recidivism, and the contents and circumstances of the crime, and before and after it.