피고인은 2013. 11. 15. 부산 동래구에 있는 부산동래경찰서에서, “2013. 11. 6. 03:40경 부산 동래구 C에 있는 피고인 운영의 D노래방 룸에서 E으로부터 강간을 당하였다”는 취지의 고소장을 작성한 다음 이를 불상의 경찰관에게 제출하고, 같은 날 11:00경 위 경찰서 수사과 경제1팀 사무실에서 경사 F에게 “E이 피고인을 밀쳐 바닥에 눕히고 바지와 팬티를 벗긴 다음, ‘악’ 소리를 지르며 반항을 함에도 성기를 삽입하려 하였고, 음부를 핥았다”는 취지로 피해 진술을 하고, 2014. 5. 13. 부산 연제구에 있는 부산지방검찰청 718호에서 검사에게 “E이 피고인의 음부에 성기까지 삽입하여 강간을 하였다”라는 취지로 피해 진술을 하였다.

However, in fact, the Defendant was drinking alcohol with E, etc. from the Gnonos bank located in the above Dnos bank, and served as potteries and kis under the agreement with E.

In this respect, the defendant committed a false accusation for the purpose of having E receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of suspect E by the prosecution;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning H;

1. Each police statement of the defendant;

1. A complaint;

1. Status of receipt and handling of the incident;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (on-site mobilization status, hearing of I telephone statements from the employer Gnonoba bank business operator, etc.);

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. The reason [the scope of recommendation] and the basic area (6 to 2 years) of the first-class sentence (6 to 3 years) (the special person) of the first-class sentence (the decision of sentence] [the decision of sentence] of the defendant's false accusation is that if the person against whom no complaint was filed by rape was prosecuted due to the defendant's false accusation, it would result in irrecoverable injury, and that the person under whose complaint was filed by the defendant would have experienced considerable mental and physical pain while attending several investigative agencies and undergoing investigations.