도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The sentence of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Even when considering the fact that the defendant was aware of and against the crime, and that there is a family member to support the crime of this case, the crime of this case is deemed to drive a vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.096% without a driver's license in light of the background, method and contents of the crime, and the quality of the crime is not good, and the defendant has a record of criminal punishment several times due to driving under the influence of alcohol or without a driver's license, and in particular, the crime of this case was committed under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act on June 2014 and again during the suspension of the execution of the sentence, taking full account of all the circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the defendant's assertion is not reasonable because the sentence of the court below is too too large.
3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition