However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of five years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The part of the facts charged was revised to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's defense right.

Defendant

In addition, the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") is the victim D and E's father.

From July 2012, the Defendant: (a) from the time of new walling, entered the door door-to-door visit of the room where the victims come to the new wall time; and (b) led the victims to commit an indecent act.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts by relatives);

A. Although the Defendant stated “the name” in the facts charged on July 13, 2012 as “the date on which the date is unknown,” the victim D made a statement to the effect that “the police was indecent act from the Defendant during the period from July 13, 2012 to July 22, 2013 during which the move-in report was made to the said residence” (Evidence No. 91 of the Evidence Record).

Since the defendant's defense right is not affected, it shall be stated in the above without modification of indictment procedure.

The victim D (the age of 13 at that time) visits to the room that had been locked in the defendant's residence located in the Mansan-si, Mansan-si, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, the time of the new wall, and the victim's chest and the defendant's chest were rhyd.

B. On the day when the date of 2013 cannot be known, the Defendant was able to gather her fingers into the victim E (at the time) and the mother of the victim, and was able to do so in the victim’s clothes on the victim’s clothes.

(c)

On the day when the date is unknown in 2015, the Defendant entered the victim E (the 13 years of age at the time) in the above residence of the victim, who was living in the victim E (the 13 years of age at the time) with Raber, and became the victim's sexual organ by hand.

(d)

On December 2016, the Defendant, at the time of the new wall, was unable to know of the date of December, 2016, visited the victim D (at the time of 17 years of age) in the room where he was under the victim D (at the time of 17 years of age) as drick, and got the victim's chest by hand.

In this respect.