상해
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.
The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that there was no injury to the victim, since the victim did not correspond to the interests of the defendant for the navigation of the defendant.
2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the victim D had consistently made a statement from the investigative agency that the defendant was lided by a small-sized navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigational navigation
However, as stated in the facts charged in this case, as to whether the defendant was injured by the left side of the victim's left shoulder and caused injuries to the victim's lids at the above defendant's residence, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence as follows: (i) although the defendant acknowledged that he was her at the defendant's residence from the investigative agency to the court of the trial, he consistently stated that he was her and that he was her. (ii) The witness F of the court below, the police officer called the victim's presence after receiving a report at the time, failed to confirm the victim's upper part when she was dispatched to the scene; and (iii) the defendant testified that he was her was unable to confirm the victim's body when she was sent to the scene; and (iv) the defendant was unable to confirm the victim's body or her clothes because she did not fit the victim's body or her own soil.