A. Fact-finding 1) The Plaintiff is an employee belonging to the E Trade Union and is the Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) from June 15, 201 to June 15, 201.

Defendant C is an employee dispatched to the workplace of container, and Defendant C is an equipment engineer to operate halogs at the workplace of the Defendant Company. Defendant C and D are the operators of F Twiters. Defendant C and D have the driver operate the F Twiters around 09:0 on August 13, 2015. Defendant C and D neglected to operate the equipment without any damage to the Plaintiff’s equipment on the part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle or cargo, with the knowledge that the safety finite (one finite container) of the cargo loaded at the above Twitler’s operation was not separated, even though they were not separated. Defendant C and D were aware that the cargo loaded at the above Twitler’s operation was separated from the cargo loaded at the workplace of the Plaintiff Company. Defendant C and C had the Plaintiff stop the cargo loaded at the lower-class, and had the Plaintiff check the safety of the Plaintiff’s work and conduct, etc. on the part of the Plaintiff’s operation, but neglected to operate the container without any damage to the Plaintiff’s vehicle or container without any damage to the Plaintiff’s vehicle or container.

(3) On the ground of the instant accident, Defendant C was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million with the Suwon District Court Ansan Branch of KRW 2015Ma1132, and Defendant D received a summary order of KRW 5 million with the said court’s order of KRW 2015 high-ranking6535, and the said judgment and the summary order became final and conclusive around that time. (B) According to the above facts, Defendant C, the employer of Defendant C, Defendant C, and Defendant C, and D are liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident. (c) The Defendants’ assertion against the exemption or limitation of liability is 1).