1. 업무 방해 피고인은 2018. 3. 4. 19:40 경 대전 서구 C에 있는 D 식당 2 층에서 술과 음식을 먹은 후 위 식당 업주인 피해자 E( 여, 33세 )에게 신용카드를 건네주면서 세금 계산서도 끊어 달라고 요구하여, 피해자가 신용카드 결제시 세금 계산서를 별도로 발급해 줄 수 없다고 하자, 술에 취해 테이블에 올라 앉아 수저 통 등을 집어 던지면서 “ 썅 년 죽여 버린다, 저년 내가 꼭 죽일 거다,

This restaurant shall be open to the public.

“In doing so with a large amount of desire, customers who are suffering from disturbance for about 25 minutes were unable to provide meals, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. In the time and place of Paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant’s disturbance as above; (b) obstructed the Defendant’s disturbance; and (c) obstructed the Defendant, who is an employee working at the above restaurant, and inflicted an injury on the Defendant, such as the inner part and the ductal part in need of medical treatment for approximately twenty (20) days; (d) caused the Defendant’s injury to the Defendant, such as the inner part and the ductal part.

3. At around 20:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the performance of official duties at the above place; (b) the police officers I (25) belonging to the Daejeon Police Station H District of the Daejeon Police Station, called out after receiving a report on the disturbance in the above restaurant, used the Defendant to stop the disturbance and take it out; (c) but (d) the Defendant’s refusal to do any sprink and any low-year death shall be discarded.

this restaurant shall be opened to the public.

“A police officer’s failure to arrest the Defendant in the act of committing an offense, i.e., having his hand knife his right breast part on his own right chest part of the police she opened, she teared, and interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Each written statement of E and G preparation;

1. An injury diagnosis certificate;