사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and four months.
Seized evidence 3 through 5 shall be confiscated respectively.
No. 1 of the seized evidence.
Punishment of the crime
"2018 Highest 923"
1. The accused and the false statements in the name of the accused in the name of the accused in the criminal investigation agency and the Governor of the Financial Supervisory Service, by misrepresenting them to obtain money and valuables from many unspecified persons, and the names in the name of the victims were stolen as they were the employees of the investigative agency and used to commit the crime. As such, the amount deposited in the accounts of the victims was found to have been used for the crime, and thus, they should undergo the process of reporting to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, and the accused, upon receiving the instructions from the victims in the name of the deceased in the name of the victim, conspired in order to take charge of excluding 3% amount of damage from the victims to the accounts designated by the needy in the name of the victim in the name of the victim.
Pursuant to the above conspiracys, the Defendant and the person infinites, in a place where the location of around 09:54 on March 6, 2018 cannot be known, misrepresenting the victim G by telephone to the investigation agency and misrepresenting the employee of the investigation agency, and the account in the name of the party was used for committing the crime due to the theft of the name of the party.
If the bank account is not opened to the account, the money in the account can be withdrawn, so that it is possible to recover the money and return it to the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service unless it is more than after checking whether the money is illegal on the face of a loan.
“Falsely speaking to the purport that the Defendant was “A” in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H on the same day, and around 13:44 on the same day, the Defendant transferred 70,000 won in cash from the said victim to a corporate bank near the taxi and received KRW 7,80,000 from the said victim, and then remitted the Defendant’s fee of KRW 3,266,000 to the bank account directed by the Defendant who was not his name.
Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the person who was unable to obtain his name, by deceiving the above victim as above, received 7080,000 won in cash from the above victim, from that time until March 13, 2018.