손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a financial institution that mainly provides the receipt and loan of deposits and installment savings. The Defendant is the head of the Plaintiff’s department and the person who was in charge of the loan business.
B. As indicated in Table 1, the Plaintiff carried out a guarantee loan (hereinafter “instant guarantee loan”) and a credit loan (hereinafter “credit loan”) by stealing the Defendant’s personal relative name as indicated below attached Table 2.
1. Table 1: 0. CD, E. 10. 30,00,00 11,96,000 G on March 24, 2006; 40. 00,000 G on June 30, 2000; 00,000 G on June 30, 2006; 00,000,000 on June 30, 200, 2000; 40. 10,000,000 for 20. 30,000,000, 29,000 for 29,000 H. 11,00,000 on September 11, 200, 2006; 10,000 credit loans under the Credit Guarantee Act;
C. From November 29, 2010 to December 1, 2010, Q organization conducted a general occasional audit of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant audit”). While the Defendant and the employees in charge discovered the illegal loan of KRW 558,386,00 in total, including the instant guarantee loan (excluding the loan to H), the Q organization demanded the Plaintiff to exercise full power to collect the loan instead of taking any further civil and criminal measures, taking into account the fact that some measures and compensation measures were taken against the relevant parties, including the Defendant were taken.
Of the credit debtors of this case, J, K, L, and P among the credit debtors of this case are the credit loans of this case.