보험에관한 소송
1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:
The plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. On October 21, 2010 and November 19, 2010, the Plaintiff concluded each insurance contract with the Defendant as the insured as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant insurance contracts”) with the Defendant as the insured, and each of the instant insurance contracts includes the security for per hospitalization day.
B. The status of the defendant's insurance contracts are as follows:
In the case of modern marine fire insurance, Chinese fire insurance, and Samsung Life Insurance, the plaintiff did not submit a reply to an order to submit certain financial transaction information consistent with the plaintiff's assertion. However, the plaintiff asserts that the contents of the insurance contract are extracted from the defendant's financial data and the defendant's insurance accident details provided by the Insurance Development Institute. Accordingly, the defendant argues that the claim in this case itself is asserted, while the defendant does not expressly dispute the details of each of the above insurance contracts and the insurance money alleged by the plaintiff, it is reasonable to recognize the plaintiff's
No. 1 insurance company's monthly insurance premium of KRW 0.30,000 per annum, KRW 30,000 per annum, KRW 10.30,00 Scand disease of KRW 120,00 22,60,679, 000 per annum on February 3, 200, KRW 00, KRW 30,000, KRW 30,000, KRW 30,000, KRW 30,000, KRW 12,610,000, KRW 30,000, KRW 40, KRW 30,000, KRW 40, KRW 30,000, KRW 40, KRW 30,000, KRW 10,000, KRW 40,000, KRW 300,000, KRW 304,030,304,304,00