except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C Freight.

On November 1, 2013, at around 10:30, the Defendant proceeded ahead of the fluoral boundary point of Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun, to the fluoral area of Sung-gun, Sung-gun, Sung-gun.

The location had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes when a vehicle drives along a road without a median line.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and tried to discover the ozone part of the victim D(70 years old) driving and avoid the collision, which was going over to the left side of the road, and received the front part of the victim's vehicle as the front part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, at around 10:35 on November 1, 2013, the Defendant caused the victim D to die by the above occupational negligence. In addition, the Defendant caused the death of the victim D from a cage at E Hospital to a cage cage cages, fages, and fry

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the occurrence of traffic accidents and written statements of autopsy;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. It shall be decided as ordered by the court on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., that the vehicle is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, that the vehicle is smoothly agreed with the victim's bereaved family members, and that it is an initial offender);