성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Criminal facts
From the end of December 2016, Defendants are married couple and conspired to engage in sexual traffic against customers by employing female employees while operating a sexual traffic business establishment of D in Gwangju Northern-gu C. From the end of December, 2016.
From that time to January 13, 2017, the Defendants installed 6 rooms, shower rooms, etc. in D business establishments, and received 100,000 won from the 10 customers, and guide them to the inside room, and let female employees commit similar acts to stimulate sexual organ of customers by hand, etc.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the suspect against the Defendants
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing enforcement photographs;
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant A who is subject to the sentence of imprisonment: The defendant B who is subject to a fine;
1. Attraction of a workhouse (Defendant B) Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;
1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B) of the suspended sentence;
1. (Defendant A) Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;
1. The collection under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (Defendant A) aims to deprive the criminal of unlawful profits from such act in order to eradicate such act, such as arranging sexual traffic, and thus, the scope of the collection is limited to the profits actually acquired by the criminal. In this case, the prosecutor has not imposed the additional collection, and the record alone makes it difficult to specify the profits from the mediation of sexual traffic of Defendant A, and thus the additional collection is not imposed.