When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 14:10 on October 7, 2017, the Defendant: D, “D” located in Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, did not put the gap in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected in the first floor food store, into the shopping bags in which the head of other security team E manages, and without calculating the amount equivalent to KRW 95,980 of the market price of food and raw materials, such as a flady paper, earth and sand bags, and so on. The summary of evidence was stolen.

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (as to the recovery of damaged articles and on-site photographing);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant was sentenced to a fine for the same kind of larceny crime in the recent years, and is disadvantageous to the defendant.

The defendant's value of stolen damage is about KRW 90,00,00,000, the defendant's agreement with the victim, and the fact that the defendant is against the victim is favorable.

In addition, the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the age, sex, etc. of the defendant, shall be comprehensively considered and the sentence of a fine shall be determined as ordered (limited to the same time, but the sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed in the event of a crime of the same kind

The decision is judged).