beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.11.16 2014가합4023

가등기말소 등

Text

1. The defendant on February 15, 2001 to the plaintiffs as to the real estate stated in the separate sheet No. 1 list.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Nonparty E, Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, Nonparty F, and Defendant C are children of the Party’s status network D.

The network D owned each building listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”) and the separate sheet No. 2 (hereinafter “instant building”) (hereinafter “instant building”) and the aforementioned “instant land” in common name.

The network D died on December 15, 2009.

B. The inheritance of the instant real estate was commenced due to the death of D related to the ownership of the instant real estate.

As to the land of this case, the registration of transfer of shares of 1/5 shares in the name of E, the plaintiffs, F, and the defendant was completed on October 14, 2014 by Cheongju District Court No. 19090 received on October 14, 2014.

The building of this case (attached Nos. 2 through 7 is each unregistered building) is owned by E, Plaintiffs, F, and Defendant according to the inheritance share ratio of 1/5.

C. From May 12, 1998 to the time of the death of the deceased, the Defendant, on behalf of the deceased, directly leased the instant building after the death of the deceased and was paid by Nonparty G, H, I, and J as the lessee.

On February 15, 2001, the provisional registration of this case on the land of this case for which the provisional registration of this case was established was completed on February 15, 2001, the provisional registration of the right holder as the defendant and the right holder as the defendant and the right holder's right to claim the transfer of ownership No. 1977 on February 15, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the "provisional registration of this case").

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3 (if there is any number, including a number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 3 and 11, and the purport of the whole arguments and arguments

2. Determination on the claim for cancellation of the provisional registration of this case

A. As to the establishment of the provisional registration of this case, the Defendant asserted by the 1 Plaintiffs against the establishment of the provisional registration of this case by stealing the seal imprint design without the consent of the network D around February 2001, and completed the provisional registration of this case as to the land of this case.