A shall be punished by fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,00, and by fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

[criminal record] On July 21, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a period of four months by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Jeonju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 29, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On May 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 15:15 on May 30, 2015, at the residence of the G located in Jeong-gu, Jung-gu, Sin-si, the Defendant expressed a bath to the police officer I, etc. belonging to Jung-gu Police Station H District; (b) was indicted on September 30, 2015, and was in danger of drinking, and was tried as the Defendant for interference with the performance of official duties under the Jeonju District Court Eup Branch 2015 High Order 479, Jeonju Branch 479, the Defendant was tried to request the witness B and C to make a false statement in order to obtain the judgment of innocence at the above trial.

Accordingly, on May 2015, the Defendant requested the court to make a false statement to the effect that “K” restaurants, B, and C, which are located in theJ of Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Gyeong-dong, would have the police officers make a false statement, thereby allowing B and C to make a false statement.”

Accordingly, as described in B B(2), C, as described in paragraph 3, made a false statement at the Jeonju District Court's Criminal Court's branch of Eup/Myeon on March 22, 2016. 15:00, in order to make a false statement.

As a result, the Defendant had B and C make a false statement, and instigated the perjury respectively.

2. On March 22, 2016, Defendant B appeared as a witness of the first instance trial of the case obstructing the performance of official duties against Defendant B, the lower court’s order 2015 senior 479 senior 479, and made an oath at the Jeonju District Court’s Eup/Myeon court’s Eup/Myeon court, which was located in Susungdong, on March 22, 2016, and asked Defendant B asked Defendant B of whether the police officer “on his/her own, the situation from the moment the police officer entered the room to the time he/she was faced with all the conditions of the police officer’s entry,” and the prosecutor stated “a case” as follows: (2) there was a fact that Defendant A expressed a desire to

I would like to ask "I will not".

“.................. the prosecutor stated “........ for Defendant A’s drinking....”