However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is the subject of C, and C was tried to rape D.

In relation to the above C case, the Defendant had been able to say that he was “her sexual assaulted from C” from D, and demanded D to prepare “Istan to the effect that he did not have sexual assaulted from the above C,” and there was a fact that the Defendant prepared in advance and presented “Istan” to D to use it as it is.

Nevertheless, on July 8, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the case of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Special Rape) against Pyeongtaek-si, 1036 Suwon District Court No. 23, Pyeongtaek-ro, 2015 and 53, from the court of law No. 2015, the Defendant sent to the Defendant’s defense counsel’s answer to the question, stating that “The Defendant’s written application for 276th victim’s shot of the evidence record is not a prior transfer of the documents prepared by the witness, but rather a transfer of the documents prepared by the witness to the victim at the witness’s oral request by the witness that there is no fact of sexual assault or a deadly threatening,” and “The witness has no honor to the witness to write the text of the 275th agreement on the evidence record, but there is no other document prepared by the other document, and the victim’s application for 276th victim’s own inquiry that it should have been done by the witness.”

The witness responded to the question, “I cannot say that I have sexual assaulted” in the question, “I would like to say that I would not see the word “sexual assault” at the victim’s mother’s entrance.

“A person who was sexually abused from D” did not have any speech from D to “A,” and testified as if the above D voluntarily prepared.

Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

(i) the evidence;