2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16093, Jan. 1,

The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of the B-to-pur vehicle.

On April 19, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 00:10,000, and proceeded at a speed of about 80km, depending on the two-lane of light-ray intersection, and one-lane of light-ray intersection from the main viewing to the innovation city from the innovation city.

At the time, there were nights, and there were frequent traffic of vehicles, so that the driver of the motor vehicle was obliged to accurately operate the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle and to safely drive the traffic situation on the front side of the road and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded with the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and continued to proceed with the centralized separation zone on the left-hand side of the construction and management of the viewing as the front-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and received the central separation zone with the front-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as seen above, destroyed the repair cost of KRW 503,720,00, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of the actual survey report, traffic accident evidence evidence photographs, requests, and the Acts and subordinate statutes for each investigation report;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;