2. It is recognized that the defendant divided his mistake, and that the defendant agreed with the victim E and I at the court below and agreed with the victim C at the time of the trial.

However, the crime of this case is not very good; the defendant committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime, even though he had several criminal records for the same kind of crime, again again during the period of repeated crime for the same crime; the number of victims is several and several times; the degree of injury suffered by the victim F is not minor; damage recovery or agreement has not been reached until the judgment was rendered; the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, are considered, and it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.