건물명도(인도)
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the reasoning of the court of first instance, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following changes to the reasoning.
2. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, Article 49(6) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) of the third-party 9 and 10 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) shall be construed as “Article 49(6) of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (amended by Act No. 14113, Mar. 29, 2016; hereinafter “former Urban Improvement Act”) applicable to this case, and Article 81(1)
Article 40 (1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas in Part 3 of Part 16 is regarded as "Article 40 (1) of the former Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas (see current Article 65 (1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas)".
The "Urban Improvement Act" in the fourth 8th Do shall be improved to "Gu Urban Improvement Act".
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.