Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. Interference with business;

가. 피고인은 2013. 7. 21. 오전 무렵 전남 영암군 C에 있는 피해자 D가 운영하는 미용실에서 E가 피고인에 관한 말을 하고 다닌다는 이유로 E를 찾아 위 미용실에 왔다가 마침 그곳에 있던 E에게 “그래서 일렀냐, 그러니깐 사람들이 얕보는 거여. 씹할 년, 콱 주댕이를 문질러 버릴라. 행동 똑바로 해라.”라고 큰 소리로 말하는 등 약 20분 동안 소란을 피워 피해자의 미용실 영업 업무를 방해하였다.

B. As to the work that the Defendant argued with F around July 7, 2014, the Defendant found the beauty room described in the foregoing paragraph, and considered the victim D as “I am saw I am h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

2. On June 10, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim on the ground that the victim D lent money from the Defendant and did not meet the payment deadline, while talking with G and I at H restaurants operated by G in Yong-gun, Yong-Nam, Yong-gun around the morning on June 10, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, J, I, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the contents of K Telephone call for reference);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business, Selection of Fine) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;