When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the resident of the Ocheon-gu Seoul apartment complex and the victim is the person who works as the warden for the management of the apartment complex.

On June 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 16:00, before the management office of the above C apartment; (b) C apartment was audited in 2015; and (c) was not audited in 2016; and (c) the victim did not have committed an corruption in the process of managing the apartment; and (d) despite the absence of any fact that the victim was in the process of managing the apartment, the document attached to the document stating “main points of external audit attached to the letter of notice on external audit support projects for external audit in 2016” (hereinafter referred to as “the document of this case”) was divided into several apartment residents of the above apartment as if the document was the data of the accounting audit of the C apartment, and said, “the warden has no interest in managing the apartment, and it is consistent with the financial statement attached thereto.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. Results of this Court’s video CD verification;

1. A complaint (the defendant and his defense counsel) (the defendant and the apartment resident at the time of the instant case shall conduct an external audit.

It means only “The managing director makes a false statement as stated in the facts constituting a crime.”

It argues that there is no fact that the auditor stated that he/she is suitable for the addition to the auditor.

In this regard, according to CCTV images recorded in the situation at the time of this case, it is confirmed that the defendant divided the documents of this case to the apartment resident together with other female members, and ② the witness E at the time of this case viewed that the defendant talks with other residents about it as criminal facts.

The witness F testified that at the time of this case, Aussians had been living in the Republic of Korea.

d. Does.