except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On January 22, 2013, the Defendant driven the above taxi on January 10:15, 2013, and proceeded to turn to the left at an insurous speed depending on one-lane of the three-lanes in the direction of DMF distance from the south intersection.

At that time, the signal was an intersection where the signal was installed, so in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to view the signal at the front and to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in a straight line in violation of the signal, and received the front part of the victim D(35 years old) driving in accordance with the direct go signal from the direction of the DMC Advanced Industrial Center in the direction of the DoMC Advanced Industrial Center, which is facing the deadline, in front of the left part of the E SP car driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim F (F) who was on the said spathy car, requiring approximately 8 weeks of medical treatment to the victim F (F, 30 years of age) who was on the said spathy car, requiring approximately 2 weeks of medical treatment to the same victim G (V) for about 2 weeks of medical treatment to the same victim H (1) for about 2 weeks of medical treatment to the same victim H (1) for about 5 weeks of medical treatment, and for about 50 years of age to the victim I (F, 50 years of age) who was on the said spathy taxi for about 3 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. Application of each medical certificate, on-site photographing statute;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant shall make his/her mistake.