If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

[criminal history] On March 5, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million by the Daegu District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and a fine of KRW 2 million by the Changwon District Court on July 25, 2012.

[Criminal facts] On July 18, 2018, the Defendant driven a 25 tons truck truck truck vehicle with approximately 0.126% alcohol content in the 2km section from the day before the restaurant, where it is impossible to identify the trade name in the Gumi-si Do road at the Gumi-si, Gumi-si, Sinsi-si, and located in the 2km section from the day before the restaurant to the Domi-si, Youngcheon-si, Domi-si.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the arrest of any suspect in violation of traffic laws on roads, and a statement in the circumstances of any driver who takes the driving;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Inquiries about criminal history and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of investigation report (the same type of crime records);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Provisional Payment Order not only committed a second offense without being aware that the Defendant had been punished four times due to drinking, but also committed a second offense during the period of probation of imprisonment with labor for other crimes.

Even though the degree of alcohol was not somewhat weak, since the driver tried to enter an expressway by driving the freight vehicle, the risks associated with the vehicle were not small.

However, the defendant reflects the wrongness in depth and does not repeat again in the future.

The distance of driving has not yet come to the actual accident and the distance is also visible.

The preceding criminal records are old, and they are punished by a fine.