except that the execution of the sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 25, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sought the main point of “D’s operation of the Victim C, which is located in Madon-si B on October 21, 2018; and (b) sought from the victim that he would not sell alcoholic beverages, and (c) died of a fine on the ground of a fine by making a report.

"A person who dumps the victim and dumbs the victim's voice, making it difficult to avoid disturbance for about one hour.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's bar business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of C’s Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, even though the defendant had been punished several times for the same crime, committed the instant crime.

In light of the contents of each crime and the contents of the crime of this case, it is also necessary to strictly punish the defendant because he did not refrain from drinking and it seems that his tendency to disregard the law is strong.

Provided, That the victim does not want the punishment, and there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine due to the same kind of crime in consultation with the victim, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the circumstances against which the defendant is against.