청구이의
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, except for adding the following judgments to the allegations that the plaintiff either renders or re-renders in the trial, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The second and second boxes of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to both the "this Court" and the "Usu District Court".
The term "witnessness" in the third sentence 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as "witnessness of the court of first instance", the term "before the date of preparation" in the first tenth sentence shall be read as "before the date of preparation", and the term "this court" in the second sentence shall be read as "the court of first instance".
In the fourth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “written” in the fourth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be read as “written entrustment,” and the phrase “as of the date of closing argument of this case” in the 17th sentence shall be read as “before the date of closing argument of this case,”
2. Additional determination
A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that there are special circumstances, different from ordinary cases, when the Plaintiff issued the Plaintiff’s certificate of his/her personal seal impression and the certificate of his/her personal seal impression to D at the time of the preparation of the commission of the instant notarial deed. Considering these circumstances, the instant notarial deed does not have to have been entrusted with his/her legitimate authority, and therefore, it does not have the effect to
In other words, at the time, the defendant only told D to the effect that the defendant's address is uneasiness, and D merely knew of legal terms such as loan certificates, authentic deeds and joint and several sureties, and there are documents needed to work a church. However, under the circumstance that the plaintiff is the owner of H land and building in Osan City, it is understood that the plaintiff's name is entered, based on this understanding, that the plaintiff is related to the church.