2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, number of crimes, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the confession of the crime, the confession of the crime, the active cooperation with the investigation agency in the investigation of narcotics crimes; and (b) the fact that there is the will of a short drug; (c) the person who was sentenced to a fine for the same kind of crime and is underway in the appellate trial after being sentenced to a fine; (d) the purchase and medication of phiphonephones over several occasions; and (e) the fact that phiphones are the reaction to the training of phiphones, etc., under the circumstances that are disadvantageous

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the lower court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Da36742, Apr. 2, 200).