On February 8, 2018, the Defendant came to go from the F building in the E around 10:50 and came to go to the front of the building.

The location is that the vehicle from the bend road is not well visible due to the road around the bend road, so there was a duty of care to check and drive the vehicle on the bend road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and instead received the front part of the Victim G(52) driving, which was driven by the police station of the Seosung Seo-gu Police Station in the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic Eup

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as damage to the number of b0 weeks of light, which requires approximately 20 weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the victim, such as the flasium and flasium

2. The instant facts charged constitute Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the proviso to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under the same paragraph.

According to the records, the victim may be found to be present at this court on August 24, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted, and expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant.

3. According to the conclusion, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.