명예훼손
All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.
While the defendant asserts that the sentencing of the court below (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable, the prosecutor asserts that the sentencing of the court below is too uneasible and unfair. The prosecutor argues that the sentencing of the court below is too uneasible.
In light of the content, motive, means, methods, etc. of the instant crime, the fact that the nature of the crime is not good is unfavorable to the Defendant.
On the other hand, the fact that there is no conclusive intention to indicate false facts to the defendant, and the fact that the mistake is recognized and reflected are favorable to the defendant.
In addition, considering all other circumstances that serve as the conditions for the sentencing specified in the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing is deemed reasonable, and it cannot be deemed that it is too heavy or unreasonable.
In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.