A. 5,00,000 won to the Plaintiff (Appointeds), 6,590,000 won to the Appointeds C, and 4,760,000 won to the Appointeds D.

A. In light of the facts in dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1, 2, 3, and Eul evidence 3, the whole arguments are as follows: ① the defendant contracted to F and G for the new construction of two lots of ground neighborhood living facilities other than Sungnam-si H (hereinafter "the instant construction") on November 1, 2012; ② the defendant's total of KRW 5 million for the plaintiff on December 26, 2013, the amount of KRW 5 million for the plaintiff E, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO 60,000 won in total, KRW 60,000,000 for KRW 30,000 from February 1, 2013 to KRW 30,000,000 for KRW 60,000,000 for KRW 60,000,000 for KRW 360,000,000 for Q 13,013.

In light of the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 5 million, KRW 6.5 million to the Selection, KRW 4.76 million, and KRW 4.7 million to the Selection D, and delay damages at the rate of 20% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from September 20, 2014 to the date of delivery of the complaint of this case. The Defendant is obligated to pay to the Selection E a delay damages at the rate of 7.5 million per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from September 20, 2014 to the date of full payment. It is reasonable to dispute the existence and scope of the Defendant’s obligation to perform from September 20, 2014 to September 20, 2014.

B. The Selection E asserts to the following purport in addition to the above amount of recognition:

In other words, the defendant is the owner and implementer of the instant construction project.

The Plaintiff and the designated parties are G’s agents of the Korea-U.S. Construction Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Korea-U.S. Construction”).