However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 19:40 on April 29, 2014, the Defendant obstructed legitimate execution of duties, such as maintenance of traffic order, etc. in the above B, on the ground that the traffic volume was high due to the traffic congestion, to B of the traffic safety department of the Busan Jin-gu, Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the traffic of which was controlled by the traffic on the vehicle at the Busan, the traffic of the traffic safety department, and the vehicle at the Busan, the traffic of the vehicle at the Busan, the traffic of which was controlled by the vehicle at the vehicle at the Busan, the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the Busan, the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the Busan, the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle at the traffic level.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence shall be determined as per the order, comprehensively taking into account the following factors: (a) there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months); (c) (d) the degree of assault against police officers; (b) the defendant is against the police officer; (c) there is no criminal history against the defendant; (d) there is no criminal history subject to the