1. On July 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) went to a “D” restaurant located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on July 14, 2017; (b) around 07:05, the Defendant: (c) went to a restaurant; (d) the victim E works in the kitchen; (c) the Defendant was not deemed the Defendant; and (d) other customers were not in the restaurant; (e) the victim’s market value on the container was 700,000 won at the gallon road.

2. On July 18, 2017, the Defendant: around 18:30 on July 18, 2017, thief discovered bicycles amounting to KRW 7.50,00 in the market price owned by the victim H located at the victim’s seat, and then stolen bicycles amounting to KRW 7.50,000 in the middle-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

3. On July 19, 2017, around 18:00 on July 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) discovered a bicycle equivalent to KRW 300,00,00 in the market price owned by the victim K established at the victim K and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of E, H and K;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment and punishment for the crime;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravated concurrent crimes are against the defendant's recognition of the crime of this case, the damage was completely recovered, and some victims are not subject to punishment against the defendant, considering the fact that the defendant has been punished several times, including the punishment for the same kind of crime, in light of the favorable circumstances, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family environment, the background, means, and result of the crime, and all the other factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors.