2. The judgment of the court below is justified in light of the following: (a) the defendant made confession of the crime and made it against his depth; (b) the defendant did not have any other criminal record, other than once having been punished for the same kind of crime or fine; and (c) the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case after his husband's death; (d) although the crime of this case was committed of this case by deceiving the victim D with a large amount of interest, thereby deceiving the defendant about 89 million won for 2 years; and (e) embezzlement of the lease deposit deposit 66.5 million won which he was requested to return while working as a broker assistant of the licensed real estate agent office; (e) the total amount of damage caused by the crime of this case exceeds 150 million won; (e) the victims' damage has not been completely recovered; and (e) the defendant's age, career, character, character, environment, motive, means and result after the crime of this case was committed.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.