The defendant is the victim B (n, 20 years of age)'s pro-Japanese.

On August 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) brought an injury to the victim on the ground that the injured party, at around 23:00 of the mountain mountain zone, C apartment of the mountain village, and at around 115 Do 1101, 115 Do 1101, her father, her father, speaks without her micker; (b) on the ground of drinking, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as satise satis, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Penalty of a fine not exceeding two million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day) to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) does not have any unfavorable condition, such as the fact that the degree of injury of the victim is relatively heavy, but it still recognizes and reflects the defendant's mistake, the defendant's age is still old and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the victim's fluor does not want the defendant's punishment, the victim's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor'