beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.11.13 2014구합31227

건강보험료 및 연체금 부과처분 취소 소송

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is a locally provided policyholder under the National Health Insurance Act.

B. Around February 2012, the Defendant imposed and collected a notice on the Plaintiff on the aggregate of KRW 444,01 and KRW 2.444,010, and KRW 147,260, and KRW 294,520, and KRW 147,260, and KRW 294,520, and KRW 147,260, and KRW 147,260, and KRW 33,150, and KRW 1,06,20, and KRW 200,00,000,000,000 for monthly premium around the same month (hereinafter “each disposition of this case”) and around December 2012, the Plaintiff received the notice at that time.

C. On September 5, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Defendant’s Health Insurance Objection Committee to the effect that “the amount of net assets would be deducted from the assets, because there is little net assets,” and that “the amount of premiums would be reduced on July 8, 2012, taking this into account.” However, the Health Insurance Objection Committee dismissed the said application on the ground that “the scope and type of liabilities may be controversial when considering the calculation of the amount of premiums, and it is difficult to grasp the actual amount of liabilities due to changes without making public announcement.”

On September 22, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Defendant’s Health Insurance Objection Committee to the effect that “the reduction of each of the instant insurance premiums” was prohibited, but the Health Insurance Objection Committee dismissed the said application on November 6, 2013, on the ground that “the period for filing an objection has elapsed, and the portion on July 6, 2012 and August 8, 2012, is not allowed again by filing an objection to the same purport.”

E. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request with the same purport as the Health Insurance Dispute Mediation Committee on November 19, 2013, but the Health Insurance Dispute Mediation Committee notified the Plaintiff of the imposition of insurance premiums on March 24, 2014, and decided to dismiss the said request on the ground that the Health Insurance Dispute Mediation Committee imposed an objection period on the Plaintiff from February 24, 2012 to December 2012. Thus, the said request is legitimate.